Talk:Laplacian
From CFD-Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Laplacian notation) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I think we should explain all notations as far as possible. For example I have added a line expaining the <math>\nabla^2</math> notation to the [[Laplacian]] page. | I think we should explain all notations as far as possible. For example I have added a line expaining the <math>\nabla^2</math> notation to the [[Laplacian]] page. | ||
--[[User:Praveen|Praveen]] 00:35, September 13, 2005 (MDT) | --[[User:Praveen|Praveen]] 00:35, September 13, 2005 (MDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Laplacian notation == | ||
| + | i agree with you. i have seen the changes you have made. great work | ||
Latest revision as of 06:37, 13 September 2005
The Laplacian operator should be 
or are we sticking with 
. I mean standardising this is important. Please have a look into this issue.
Laplacian notation
I think we should explain all notations as far as possible. For example I have added a line expaining the 
notation to the Laplacian page.
--Praveen 00:35, September 13, 2005 (MDT)
Laplacian notation
i agree with you. i have seen the changes you have made. great work
