Talk:FAQ's
From CFD-Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: At a glance, it looks like the Ansys FAQ is mainly a CFX FAQ. I think it would probably be more accurate to call it a CFX FAQ - and since there is a CFX forum, it makes more sense also. Other FAQ sections could be added as needed (as usual). --[[User:Jasond|Jasond]] 15:03, 7 June 2007 (MDT) | : At a glance, it looks like the Ansys FAQ is mainly a CFX FAQ. I think it would probably be more accurate to call it a CFX FAQ - and since there is a CFX forum, it makes more sense also. Other FAQ sections could be added as needed (as usual). --[[User:Jasond|Jasond]] 15:03, 7 June 2007 (MDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: Okay, I think that I will start to divide the code FAQ's into separate codes then unless you or someone else object. The Fluent FAQ is already getting a bit big so having FLUENT, Gambit, Flowizard and all their other codes in one FAQ makes no sence. --[[User:Jola|Jola]] 15:53, 7 June 2007 (MDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:53, 7 June 2007
The FAQ's for codes are currently divided according to the company. Perhaps we should change this to instead be a separate FAQ for each code? Now that Ansys owns both CFX, FLUENT and ICEM is isn't very convenient to have an Ansys FAQ which covers all these codes. A code specific FAQ is more convenient to use and will survive consolidation deals when companies bye a code from another company. We can also create FAQ sections for each company that answers general questions and contains links to the specific code FAQ's. What do you think? --Jola 03:48, 7 June 2007 (MDT)
- At a glance, it looks like the Ansys FAQ is mainly a CFX FAQ. I think it would probably be more accurate to call it a CFX FAQ - and since there is a CFX forum, it makes more sense also. Other FAQ sections could be added as needed (as usual). --Jasond 15:03, 7 June 2007 (MDT)
- Okay, I think that I will start to divide the code FAQ's into separate codes then unless you or someone else object. The Fluent FAQ is already getting a bit big so having FLUENT, Gambit, Flowizard and all their other codes in one FAQ makes no sence. --Jola 15:53, 7 June 2007 (MDT)
