CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Wiki > Talk:Navier-Stokes equations

Talk:Navier-Stokes equations

From CFD-Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: Should we really reference a paper about existence and uniqueness when the paper has been retracted due to errors? I'd prefer to change the text to just mention it as a try which failed (a...)
(comment on prof. penny smith withdrawn paper)
Line 1: Line 1:
Should we really reference a paper about existence and uniqueness when the paper has been retracted due to errors? I'd prefer to change the text to just mention it as a try which failed (at least for now until a revised paper has been published). --[[User:Jola|Jola]] 07:32, 22 May 2007 (MDT)
Should we really reference a paper about existence and uniqueness when the paper has been retracted due to errors? I'd prefer to change the text to just mention it as a try which failed (at least for now until a revised paper has been published). --[[User:Jola|Jola]] 07:32, 22 May 2007 (MDT)
 +
 +
I was just about to comment on the same thing. Since there have probably been dozens of unsuccessful attempts to solving the NS equations, I would leave out the comment all together. [[User:Stefanez|Stefanez]] 03:08, 11 August 2008 (MDT)

Revision as of 09:08, 11 August 2008

Should we really reference a paper about existence and uniqueness when the paper has been retracted due to errors? I'd prefer to change the text to just mention it as a try which failed (at least for now until a revised paper has been published). --Jola 07:32, 22 May 2007 (MDT)

I was just about to comment on the same thing. Since there have probably been dozens of unsuccessful attempts to solving the NS equations, I would leave out the comment all together. Stefanez 03:08, 11 August 2008 (MDT)

My wiki