Talk:Combustion
From CFD-Wiki
(Open a new article?) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
As combustion modelling is far from being mature, the users need to have a clear knowledge of what is behind the models and what is known about flames today. For that reason, the best way is to open another article in combustion dedicated to fundamentals. The role of this article will be twofold: to give a background, and to serve as a database to which results and equations coming with the models can be referred. Let know if any concern.--[[User:Joan|Joan]] 13:14, 29 October 2007 (MDT) | As combustion modelling is far from being mature, the users need to have a clear knowledge of what is behind the models and what is known about flames today. For that reason, the best way is to open another article in combustion dedicated to fundamentals. The role of this article will be twofold: to give a background, and to serve as a database to which results and equations coming with the models can be referred. Let know if any concern.--[[User:Joan|Joan]] 13:14, 29 October 2007 (MDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is impossible to create a new article for a contributor. Hence, I am going to develop the ideas into the existing introduction. If an administrator thinks it fits, please, move the matter into a new article focusing on fundamentals, otherwise, simply revert it.--[[User:Joan|Joan]] 08:25, 30 October 2007 (MDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:25, 30 October 2007
--Joan 07:51, 5 September 2007 (MDT)Hi,
I think it is worthy to somewhat modify the introduction in order to describe in length both the combustion and turbulent regimes (flamelet,etc) early in the article. I plan to do it in the coming days or weeks. Please, let know here whether somebody has any concern.
I would like to move the premixed flame picture provided by Salva earlier in the article as I think it fits well with the premixed regime introduction. Let know here if any concern. --Joan 12:44, 12 September 2007 (MDT)
As combustion modelling is far from being mature, the users need to have a clear knowledge of what is behind the models and what is known about flames today. For that reason, the best way is to open another article in combustion dedicated to fundamentals. The role of this article will be twofold: to give a background, and to serve as a database to which results and equations coming with the models can be referred. Let know if any concern.--Joan 13:14, 29 October 2007 (MDT)
It is impossible to create a new article for a contributor. Hence, I am going to develop the ideas into the existing introduction. If an administrator thinks it fits, please, move the matter into a new article focusing on fundamentals, otherwise, simply revert it.--Joan 08:25, 30 October 2007 (MDT)
